Photo albums are all but dead

Photo albums used to be the family bible, visually recording the event of people, places and events. It required the acts of photographer, editor and album constructor. It was a labor of reminiscence and duty. As the holder of the photos and the negatives, only they had the artifacts to construct the story. As viewers we enjoy impressions among the context, artifacts of a trip are embedded, mementos of the event. The event of constructing the photo album is all but dead - it too has been abstracted.

The transformation of the photographic world to a digital reality moved the activity of album construction to the computer. Initially people focused on recreating what they had in the real world, the physical photograph. It turned out that it was more expensive per print than traditional means, but the rationale was that someone only printed what they wanted. Enter stage right, the photo editor who traditionally used contact sheets or prints now filtering with computer screens and postage stamp LCDs on cameras. Dramatically reduced, the cost to take pictures results in higher volumes of images for review, the editor continues to filter. Photos, now files, need to be backed up to CD, DVD or external storage. To work with photos beyond the basics requires software of all shapes and sizes that helps make the most of where we have evolved to be. We live in an age of visual abundance, requiring constant editing, leaving the activity of visual story telling to the dedicated few.

Forget not the magic of the Internet! Enter stage right, jogging next to digital cameras, photo-sharing websites. While the photo album continues to be nourished by older generations, the common people are looking to recover the social aspect of their visual record. The current state of the art is Flickr. Heavily edited, socially aware photo sharing, with family, friends and everyone. Screen shot of my Flickr sets The construction of the Flickr account requires the same photographer, editor and album constructor, but add to it uploader, annotator, taxonomist, commentator, moderator and more. Image distribution casts a wider net. Instead of just family and friends physically present with the photo album, anyone can browse the gallery and experience a different kind of story, one favorited and commented by the known and unknown. This introduces two pressures. First, who has access to someone’s images what and do they care. Second, these photos are a representation of someone’s impressions and moreover their view – the editing they applied to select a specific set of photos for others to experience. Now that literally everyone sees them, what is it that they intended to say? Filter, filter, filter. Far fewer images are seen and when they are, they lack the context of the human touch that made photo albums something of reverence and reminiscence. Just over the hill, on the other side of the coin, everyone enjoys the endless visual content that the society has constructed, defining the societal view and the visual trend. The slow death of the analog photo album leaves us somewhere different.

Digital photo frames reintroduce the album in a Harry Potter device. Pictures often cycle through allowing the viewer to see more than a single photo. The i-mate Momento 100 is a ten-inch digital photo fame that is wifi-connected and mates with an online service to bring much, much more to photo frames. Any shortcomings are quickly forgotten when someone experiences the magic. Momento Live is the site that mates with the frame allowing the frame’s owner to subscribe to feeds, Flickr or others, and have those photos automatically downloaded and updated on the frame. Screen shot of Momento Live web siteIn addition, the frame has an email address and MMS interface. Send an email with a photo attached and the image graces the frame. The owner is no longer the album creator. People of their own selection enter the mix. Add a Flickr feed generated from a search and view endless images of <insert keywords here> by people you may never know. The Momento points in the direction of recapturing and evolving society’s notions of the photo album, the photo sharing experience. The frame becomes the magical portal into moments experienced by the individual and others, remixed to impress upon the viewer. If only we were able to capture the human touch and replay that. The story is becoming more interesting, but lacks the meaningful connections people create when they share face-to-face.

Send a photo to my Momento!

3 Responses to “Photo albums are all but dead”

  1. Frank Jania Says:

    I’d have to disagree that photo albums are all but dead. I’ve met a few people, some in their mid-twenties, who were “into scrapbooking” after moving down south and discovered this whole scrapbooking sub-culture.

    You’ll also see home shopping segments devoted entirely to scrapbooking gadgets and materials. Once you have it in your RAS scrapbooking seems to show up everywhere.

    I did a quick google search and suggestions are that scrapbooking is a $1-$6.5 billion industry.

  2. Brian D. Goodman Says:

    It is true that the scrapbook market is probably passed the photo album torch, however there are larger shifts that characterize my comments.
    While the scrap market size is almost unbelievably large, consider than just the amateur file market in 1997 was $2.7 billion.

    Katie Hafner wrote an article for the New York Times called Film Drop-Off Sites Fade Against Digital Cameras in October of 2007.

    The rate of decline is apparent from film sales — since only people who buy film need to have it developed. Over the last four years, the sale of film has been dropping at a rate of 25 to 30 percent each year. In 2006, 204 million rolls were sold, a quarter of the 800 million sold at the peak in 1999.

    There is no dearth of images. In the heyday of film, said Mr. Liem, some 25 billion images were not just captured but printed as well. By 2009, as the use of digital cameras continues to grow, some 135 billion images will be captured, but far fewer printed. Instead, those images tend to stay on people’s computers in electronic shoeboxes. The challenge, say companies like Kodak and Fujifilm, is getting people to print those images out.

    At the end of the day, a market approaching the entire size of scrapbooking has seen its slice of the pie shrink considerably. Film processing is down which means less photographs exist past pixels. The people making up the scrapbook market are spending more money on bedazzelers, die cuts and glue.

    I am still stunned that so many people scrapbook!

  3. Andrew Says:

    Well as a keen photographer and Family Historian I must say that Photo Albums have been an invaluable resource for doing the research into our families past. So if they are indeeed really dead then it is a sad day indeed for genealogists every way.

    I do use a Digital Photo Frame as well, having a new son its a great way to keep the Grandparents appraised of the lil mites progress, especially with the advent of wireless frames like the eStarling that you can email pictures to directly. (learn more here http://www.udiggit.com ).

    Is the Photo Album really dead, I dont think so just yet.

Leave a Reply


Bad Behavior has blocked 301 access attempts in the last 7 days.